How do farmers make purchase decisions?

The Three Layers of Farmer Decision-Making

1. System Reality Layer

This layer reflects the farm's physical and economic reality.

It includes:

  • pasture performance

  • animal health

  • labour availability

  • infrastructure condition

  • climate pressures

  • regulation

  • cashflow

These forces create system pressures.

Those pressures determine what problems rise in importance.

Example:

  • labour shortage

  • declining fertility

  • poor pasture productivity

  • machinery reliability issues

This layer largely determines what problems farmers must solve.

2. Priority Stack Layer

Farmers cannot fix everything at once.

They have to allocate limited:

  • money

  • time

  • learning capacity

  • staff resource

across competing improvements. This creates the priority stack.

Examples competing in the stack:

  • pasture renewal

  • labour-saving technology

  • infrastructure improvement

  • machinery replacement

  • environmental compliance

Elements within the priority stack compete on multiple dimensions. Degree of urgency vs ease of implementation vs cost vs ROI vs long-term benefit vs immediate benefit vs farmer interest vs social acceptance.

Farmer decision-making involves evaluating many trade-offs. It can be complicated!

3. Solution Selection Layer

Once a problem rises high enough in the stack, the farmer then decides how to solve it.

At this stage, the influences are:

  • advisors

  • contractors

  • suppliers

  • product features

  • price

  • brand

  • distribution

This is the layer many agribusiness companies focus on. It’s where marketing and product competition occur. Yet going upstream of this can yield benefits if the right levers can be identified and pulled.

Are Farmers B2B or B2C?

Both

Farmers cannot separate life from work. They live in their workplace. They cannot shut the door and leave the office like their urban counterparts.

Their vocation is a big part of their identity, so decisions are not always strictly rational. Emotion can be a big influence (although they are unlikely to admit this).

Their weighting of the priority stack elements will vary by category, life stage, interests, and peer norms.

Farm spending decisions sit at the intersection of economics, emotion, personal interest, and practicality.

Their purchase decisions are multi-dimensional:

  • System pressures → create urgency

  • Trade-offs → shape feasibility

  • Emotional alignment → affects desirability

  • Interest → affects attention and action

Did the free jacket with the drench swing the sale? Or was it something else?